rxrpc: Use consume_skb() rather than kfree_skb_reason()
authorDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tue, 7 Feb 2023 22:11:30 +0000 (22:11 +0000)
committerDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tue, 7 Feb 2023 23:11:20 +0000 (23:11 +0000)
Use consume_skb() rather than kfree_skb_reason().

Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

net/rxrpc/skbuff.c

index 944320e65ea83524e072fcb6e81cfbceede644ba..3bcd6ee803960ba3280baf0f77508905c57d6c42 100644 (file)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace why)
        if (skb) {
                int n = atomic_dec_return(select_skb_count(skb));
                trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, refcount_read(&skb->users), n, why);
-               kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_CONSUMED);
+               consume_skb(skb);
        }
 }
 
@@ -78,6 +78,6 @@ void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head *list)
                int n = atomic_dec_return(select_skb_count(skb));
                trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, refcount_read(&skb->users), n,
                                rxrpc_skb_put_purge);
-               kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_CONSUMED);
+               consume_skb(skb);
        }
 }