``sequential`` is only useful for random I/O, where fio would normally
generate a new random offset for every I/O. If you append e.g. 8 to randread,
- you would get a new random offset for every 8 I/O's. The result would be a
- seek for only every 8 I/O's, instead of for every I/O. Use ``rw=randread:8``
+ you would get a new random offset for every 8 I/Os. The result would be a
+ seek for only every 8 I/Os, instead of for every I/O. Use ``rw=randread:8``
to specify that. As sequential I/O is already sequential, setting
``sequential`` for that would not result in any differences. ``identical``
behaves in a similar fashion, except it sends the same offset 8 number of
**ios**
Number of I/Os performed by all groups.
**merge**
- Number of merges I/O the I/O scheduler.
+ Number of merges performed by the I/O scheduler.
**ticks**
Number of ticks we kept the disk busy.
**in_queue**
change.
Split up, the format is as follows (comments in brackets denote when a
-field was introduced or whether its specific to some terse version):
+field was introduced or whether it's specific to some terse version):
::