cpufreq: Use has_target() instead of !setpolicy
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:05:48 +0000 (08:35 +0530)
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:41:04 +0000 (11:41 +0200)
commit5ddc6d4e30f4e8701af661601ca07abdfc237996
tree01e9bb5ab0c4177477d0cd3af4c77c9d8f03af61
parent407d0fff22667598fe3602965f0e0bf78dabdca5
cpufreq: Use has_target() instead of !setpolicy

For code consistency, use has_target() instead of !setpolicy everywhere,
as it is already done at several places. Maybe we should also use
"!has_target()" instead of "cpufreq_driver->setpolicy" where we need to
check if the driver supports setpolicy, so to use only one expression
for this kind of differentiation.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c