|author||Richard Genoud <email@example.com>||2017-06-01 14:18:26 +0200|
|committer||Linus Walleij <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2017-06-09 09:38:27 +0200|
gpio: mvebu: fix gpio bank registration when pwm is used
If more than one gpio bank has the "pwm" property, only one will be registered successfully, all the others will fail with: mvebu-gpio: probe of f1018140.gpio failed with error -17 That's because in alloc_pwms(), the chip->base (aka "int pwm"), was not set (thus, ==0) ; and 0 is a meaningful start value in alloc_pwm(). What was intended is mvpwm->chip->base = -1. Like that, the numbering will be done auto-magically Moreover, as the region might be already occupied by another pwm, we shouldn't force: mvpwm->chip->base = 0 nor mvpwm->chip->base = id * MVEBU_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK; Tested on clearfog-pro (Marvell 88F6828) Fixes: 757642f9a584 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support") Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <email@example.com> Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <firstname.lastname@example.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <email@example.com>
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index cdef2c78cb3b..5104b6398139 100644
@@ -768,6 +768,13 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
mvpwm->chip.dev = dev;
mvpwm->chip.ops = &mvebu_pwm_ops;
mvpwm->chip.npwm = mvchip->chip.ngpio;
+ * There may already be some PWM allocated, so we can't force
+ * mvpwm->chip.base to a fixed point like mvchip->chip.base.
+ * So, we let pwmchip_add() do the numbering and take the next free
+ * region.
+ mvpwm->chip.base = -1;