pNFS: Avoid read/modify/write when it is not necessary
authorKazuo Ito <ito_kazuo_g3@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:39:03 +0000 (18:39 +0900)
committerTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:33:55 +0000 (17:33 -0500)
commit2cde04e90d5be46b4b6655b965b496e6b6f18e49
tree5fc7ea30fb06a4fe419b71ec9e29bc1173a97a6b
parent97ae91bbf3a70fc8cee3c9030564cfc892cc8cee
pNFS: Avoid read/modify/write when it is not necessary

As the block and SCSI layouts can only read/write fixed-length
blocks, we must perform read-modify-write when data to be written is
not aligned to a block boundary or smaller than the block size.
(612aa983a0410 pnfs: add flag to force read-modify-write in ->write_begin)

The current code tries to see if we have to do read-modify-write
on block-oriented pNFS layouts by just checking !PageUptodate(page),
but the same condition also applies for overwriting of any uncached
potions of existing files, making such operations excessively slow
even it is block-aligned.

The change does not affect the optimization for modify-write-read
cases (38c73044f5f4d NFS: read-modify-write page updating),
because partial update of !PageUptodate() pages can only happen
in layouts that can do arbitrary length read/write and never
in block-based ones.

Testing results:

We ran fio on one of the pNFS clients running 4.20 kernel
(vanilla and patched) in this configuration to read/write/overwrite
files on the storage array, exported as pnfs share by the server.

 pNFS clients ---1G Ethernet--- pNFS server
 (HP DL360 G8)                  (HP DL360 G8)
       |                              |
       |                              |
       +------8G Fiber Channel--------+
                     |
               Storage Array
                 (HP P6350)

Throughput of overwrite (both buffered and O_SYNC) is noticeably
improved.

Ops.     |block size|   Throughput   |
         |  (KiB)   |    (MiB/s)     |
         |          |  4.20 | patched|
---------+----------+----------------+
buffered |         4|  21.3 |  232   |
overwrite|        32|  22.2 |  256   |
         |       512|  22.4 |  260   |
---------+----------+----------------+
O_SYNC   |         4|   3.84|    4.77|
overwrite|        32|  12.2 |   32.0 |
         |       512|  18.5 |  152   |
---------+----------+----------------+

Read and write (buffered and O_SYNC) by the same client remain unchanged
by the patch either negatively or positively, as they should do.

Ops.     |block size|   Throughput   |
         |  (KiB)   |    (MiB/s)     |
         |          |  4.20 | patched|
---------+----------+----------------+
read     |         4| 548   |  550   |
         |        32| 547   |  551   |
         |       512| 548   |  551   |
---------+----------+----------------+
buffered |         4| 237   |  244   |
write    |        32| 261   |  268   |
         |       512| 265   |  272   |
---------+----------+----------------+
O_SYNC   |         4|   0.46|    0.46|
write    |        32|   3.60|    3.57|
         |       512| 105   |  106   |
---------+----------+----------------+

Signed-off-by: Kazuo Ito <ito_kazuo_g3@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Watanabe <watanabe.hiroyuki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
fs/nfs/file.c