From 755c31896364ad2887c07e0383ce639d1f5b52ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jens Axboe Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:14:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Don't start new groups for numjobs= No point in doing that, and it makes two identical jobs behave differently if typed manually or implicitly with numjobs=x Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- init.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/init.c b/init.c index 047da8d5..f7211279 100644 --- a/init.c +++ b/init.c @@ -529,8 +529,7 @@ static int add_job(struct thread_data *td, const char *jobname, int job_add_num) td->ts.bw_stat[0].min_val = td->ts.bw_stat[1].min_val = ULONG_MAX; td->ddir_nr = td->o.ddir_nr; - if ((td->o.stonewall || td->o.numjobs > 1 || td->o.new_group) - && prev_group_jobs) { + if ((td->o.stonewall || td->o.new_group) && prev_group_jobs) { prev_group_jobs = 0; groupid++; } -- 2.25.1