From 393c841fe4333cdd856d0ca37b066d72746cfaa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hangbin Liu Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 09:15:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] hsr: use hsr_for_each_port_rtnl in hsr_port_get_hsr hsr_port_get_hsr() iterates over ports using hsr_for_each_port(), but many of its callers do not hold the required RCU lock. Switch to hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(), since most callers already hold the rtnl lock. After review, all callers are covered by either the rtnl lock or the RCU lock, except hsr_dev_xmit(). Fix this by adding an RCU read lock there. Fixes: c5a759117210 ("net/hsr: Use list_head (and rcu) instead of array for slave devices.") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250905091533.377443-3-liuhangbin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni --- net/hsr/hsr_device.c | 3 +++ net/hsr/hsr_main.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c index bce7b4061ce0..702da1f9aaa9 100644 --- a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t hsr_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) struct hsr_priv *hsr = netdev_priv(dev); struct hsr_port *master; + rcu_read_lock(); master = hsr_port_get_hsr(hsr, HSR_PT_MASTER); if (master) { skb->dev = master->dev; @@ -238,6 +239,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t hsr_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) dev_core_stats_tx_dropped_inc(dev); dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); } + rcu_read_unlock(); + return NETDEV_TX_OK; } diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_main.c b/net/hsr/hsr_main.c index ac1eb1db1a52..bc94b07101d8 100644 --- a/net/hsr/hsr_main.c +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_main.c @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ struct hsr_port *hsr_port_get_hsr(struct hsr_priv *hsr, enum hsr_port_type pt) { struct hsr_port *port; - hsr_for_each_port(hsr, port) + hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(hsr, port) if (port->type == pt) return port; return NULL; -- 2.25.1