From f10e6d652bc2dad67b5e7b6e6d890c76f739ed77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Weinberger Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:28:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] um: Get rid of open coded NR_SYSCALLS We can use __NR_syscall_max. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger --- arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c index 64a8fe589d6f..1683b8efdfda 100644 --- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c +++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ #include #include -extern int syscall_table_size; -#define NR_SYSCALLS (syscall_table_size / sizeof(void *)) - void handle_syscall(struct uml_pt_regs *r) { struct pt_regs *regs = container_of(r, struct pt_regs, regs); @@ -26,9 +23,10 @@ void handle_syscall(struct uml_pt_regs *r) syscall = get_syscall(r); - if ((syscall >= NR_SYSCALLS) || (syscall < 0)) + if ((syscall > __NR_syscall_max) || syscall < 0) result = -ENOSYS; - else result = EXECUTE_SYSCALL(syscall, regs); + else + result = EXECUTE_SYSCALL(syscall, regs); out: PT_REGS_SET_SYSCALL_RETURN(regs, result); -- 2.25.1