From d97fb2571a4babec09c5d1bc701a36824ccfa805 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfram Sang Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:22:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] misc: ti-st: st_kim: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() causing patterns like: timeout = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604212240.4529-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c b/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c index c4f963cf96f2..ff172cf4614d 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c +++ b/drivers/misc/ti-st/st_kim.c @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static long read_local_version(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata, char *bts_scr_name) { unsigned short version = 0, chip = 0, min_ver = 0, maj_ver = 0; static const char read_ver_cmd[] = { 0x01, 0x01, 0x10, 0x00 }; - long timeout; + long time_left; pr_debug("%s", __func__); @@ -208,11 +208,11 @@ static long read_local_version(struct kim_data_s *kim_gdata, char *bts_scr_name) return -EIO; } - timeout = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( + time_left = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( &kim_gdata->kim_rcvd, msecs_to_jiffies(CMD_RESP_TIME)); - if (timeout <= 0) { + if (time_left <= 0) { pr_err(" waiting for ver info- timed out or received signal"); - return timeout ? -ERESTARTSYS : -ETIMEDOUT; + return time_left ? -ERESTARTSYS : -ETIMEDOUT; } reinit_completion(&kim_gdata->kim_rcvd); /* -- 2.25.1