From a66b6922dc6a5ece60ea9326153da3b062977a4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bart Van Assche Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:11:35 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu() is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Johannes Berg Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Sasha Levin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Waiman Long Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-12-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 81388d028ac7..346b5a1fd062 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force) class->key = key; class->name = lock->name; class->subclass = subclass; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_after); class->name_version = count_matching_names(class); -- 2.25.1