From 76b42e28beb5ed615b093e2abb28a7064173f2ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Piggin Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:33:39 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: powernv platform is not constrained by RMA Remove incorrect comment about real mode address restrictions on powernv (bare metal), and unnecessary clamping to ppc64_rma_size. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman --- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c index 3c122d08b6c3..4448e458a797 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c @@ -164,12 +164,9 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_recoverable_ranges(unsigned long node, sizeof(struct mcheck_recoverable_range); /* - * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges. We would be - * accessing them in real mode, hence it needs to be within - * RMO region. + * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges. */ - mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc_base(size, __alignof__(u64), - ppc64_rma_size)); + mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc(size, __alignof__(u64))); memset(mc_recoverable_range, 0, size); for (i = 0; i < mc_recoverable_range_len; i++) { -- 2.25.1