From 45b033fa1afd35a8eab0af003ffac9413548f476 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kent Overstreet Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 21:06:43 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: Fix assertion in bch2_btree_key_cache_drop() Turns out this assertion was something we could legitimately hit - add a comment describing what's going on, and handle it. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet --- fs/bcachefs/btree_key_cache.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/btree_key_cache.c b/fs/bcachefs/btree_key_cache.c index f0055f17381d..0e87c19effeb 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/btree_key_cache.c +++ b/fs/bcachefs/btree_key_cache.c @@ -639,11 +639,22 @@ bool bch2_btree_insert_key_cached(struct btree_trans *trans, void bch2_btree_key_cache_drop(struct btree_trans *trans, struct btree_path *path) { + struct bch_fs *c = trans->c; struct bkey_cached *ck = (void *) path->l[0].b; - ck->valid = false; + BUG_ON(!ck->valid); - BUG_ON(test_bit(BKEY_CACHED_DIRTY, &ck->flags)); + /* + * We just did an update to the btree, bypassing the key cache: the key + * cache key is now stale and must be dropped, even if dirty: + */ + if (test_bit(BKEY_CACHED_DIRTY, &ck->flags)) { + clear_bit(BKEY_CACHED_DIRTY, &ck->flags); + atomic_long_dec(&c->btree_key_cache.nr_dirty); + bch2_journal_pin_drop(&c->journal, &ck->journal); + } + + ck->valid = false; } static unsigned long bch2_btree_key_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, -- 2.25.1