From 4475d56145f368d065b05da3a5599d5620ca9408 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 10:11:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] net: hsr: remove one synchronize_rcu() from hsr_del_port() Use kfree_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu()+kfree(). This might allow syzbot to fuzz HSR a bit faster... Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250103101148.3594545-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- net/hsr/hsr_main.h | 1 + net/hsr/hsr_slave.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_main.h b/net/hsr/hsr_main.h index fcfeb79bb040..7d7551e6f0b0 100644 --- a/net/hsr/hsr_main.h +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_main.h @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ struct hsr_port { struct net_device *dev; struct hsr_priv *hsr; enum hsr_port_type type; + struct rcu_head rcu; }; struct hsr_frame_info; diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c b/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c index 464f683e016d..006d6ef97e53 100644 --- a/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c @@ -235,7 +235,5 @@ void hsr_del_port(struct hsr_port *port) netdev_upper_dev_unlink(port->dev, master->dev); } - synchronize_rcu(); - - kfree(port); + kfree_rcu(port, rcu); } -- 2.25.1