From: Colin Ian King Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:30:10 +0000 (+0100) Subject: platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: make a couple of local functions static X-Git-Tag: v4.15-rc1~16^2~49 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f0d962392abc5b41d66ac4f7b723c82ba4f80582;p=linux-block.git platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: make a couple of local functions static The functions cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047 and cht_int33fe_find_max17047 are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static. Cleans up sparse warnings: symbol 'cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047' was not declared. Should it be static? symbol 'cht_int33fe_find_max17047' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c index 94716b2fbc00..286c6207765d 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct cht_int33fe_data { * These helpers are used to work around this by checking if an i2c-client * for the max17047 has already been registered. */ -int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data) +static int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data) { struct i2c_client **max17047 = data; struct acpi_device *adev; @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data) return 1; } -struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void) +static struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void) { struct i2c_client *max17047 = NULL;