From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:04:37 +0000 (-0700) Subject: net: add debug checks in napi_consume_skb and __napi_alloc_skb() X-Git-Tag: block-6.0-2022-08-12~31^2~386^2~1 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ee2640df2393141a2975af726802b349d51713be;p=linux-block.git net: add debug checks in napi_consume_skb and __napi_alloc_skb() Commit 6454eca81eae ("net: Use lockdep_assert_in_softirq() in napi_consume_skb()") added a check in napi_consume_skb() which is a bit weak. napi_consume_skb() and __napi_alloc_skb() should only be used from BH context, not from hard irq or nmi context, otherwise we could have races. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index cf83d9b8f41d..fec75f8bf1f4 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__napi_alloc_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, unsigned int len, struct sk_buff *skb; void *data; + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq()); len += NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN; /* If requested length is either too small or too big, @@ -981,7 +982,7 @@ void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget) return; } - lockdep_assert_in_softirq(); + DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq()); if (!skb_unref(skb)) return;