From: Ian Rogers Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:45:39 +0000 (-0700) Subject: perf tests record: Add basic uid filtering test X-Git-Tag: io_uring-6.17-20250815~64^2~174 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c54e2f82721aadd59d2a354ae2b5cc32d32047d9;p=linux-block.git perf tests record: Add basic uid filtering test Based on the system-wide test with changes around how failure is handled as BPF permissions are a bigger issue than perf event paranoia. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250604174545.2853620-6-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh index 587f62e34414..2022a4f739be 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh @@ -231,6 +231,31 @@ test_cgroup() { echo "Cgroup sampling test [Success]" } +test_uid() { + echo "Uid sampling test" + if ! perf record -aB --synth=no --uid "$(id -u)" -o "${perfdata}" ${testprog} \ + > "${script_output}" 2>&1 + then + if grep -q "libbpf.*EPERM" "${script_output}" + then + echo "Uid sampling [Skipped permissions]" + return + else + echo "Uid sampling [Failed to record]" + err=1 + # cat "${script_output}" + return + fi + fi + if ! perf report -i "${perfdata}" -q | grep -q "${testsym}" + then + echo "Uid sampling [Failed missing output]" + err=1 + return + fi + echo "Uid sampling test [Success]" +} + test_leader_sampling() { echo "Basic leader sampling test" if ! perf record -o "${perfdata}" -e "{cycles,cycles}:Su" -- \ @@ -345,6 +370,7 @@ test_system_wide test_workload test_branch_counter test_cgroup +test_uid test_leader_sampling test_topdown_leader_sampling test_precise_max