From: Alex Hung Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 23:08:04 +0000 (-0600) Subject: drm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow X-Git-Tag: io_uring-6.11-20240722~49^2~25^2~346 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8e2734bf444767fed787305ccdcb36a2be5301a2;p=linux-2.6-block.git drm/amd/display: Ensure index calculation will not overflow [WHY & HOW] Make sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will never overflow and exceess array size. This fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland Acked-by: Tom Chung Signed-off-by: Alex Hung Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c index 0c4a8fe8e5ca..f1cde1e4265f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c @@ -1453,10 +1453,9 @@ void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib_fclks( ASSERT(fclks->num_levels); vmin0p65_idx = 0; - vmid0p72_idx = fclks->num_levels - - (fclks->num_levels > 2 ? 3 : (fclks->num_levels > 1 ? 2 : 1)); - vnom0p8_idx = fclks->num_levels - (fclks->num_levels > 1 ? 2 : 1); - vmax0p9_idx = fclks->num_levels - 1; + vmid0p72_idx = fclks->num_levels > 2 ? fclks->num_levels - 3 : 0; + vnom0p8_idx = fclks->num_levels > 1 ? fclks->num_levels - 2 : 0; + vmax0p9_idx = fclks->num_levels > 0 ? fclks->num_levels - 1 : 0; dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 = 32 * (fclks->data[vmin0p65_idx].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) / 1000.0;