From: Kent Overstreet Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 04:48:14 +0000 (-0400) Subject: bcachefs: Ensure we rewind to run recovery passes X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=64b6a788bd96a0cdc11073a2d1f85413b078c1f2;p=linux-block.git bcachefs: Ensure we rewind to run recovery passes Fix a 6.16 regression from the recovery pass rework, which introduced a bug where calling bch2_run_explicit_recovery_pass() would only return the error code to rewind recovery for the first call that scheduled that recovery pass. If the error code from the first call was swallowed (because it was called by an asynchronous codepath), subsequent calls would go "ok, this pass is already marked as needing to run" and return 0. Fixing this ensures that check_topology bails out to run btree_node_scan before doing any repair. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet --- diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/recovery_passes.c b/fs/bcachefs/recovery_passes.c index c2c18c0a5429..c09ed2dd4639 100644 --- a/fs/bcachefs/recovery_passes.c +++ b/fs/bcachefs/recovery_passes.c @@ -313,6 +313,9 @@ static bool recovery_pass_needs_set(struct bch_fs *c, */ bool in_recovery = test_bit(BCH_FS_in_recovery, &c->flags); bool persistent = !in_recovery || !(*flags & RUN_RECOVERY_PASS_nopersistent); + bool rewind = in_recovery && + r->curr_pass > pass && + !(r->passes_complete & BIT_ULL(pass)); if (persistent ? !(c->sb.recovery_passes_required & BIT_ULL(pass)) @@ -323,6 +326,9 @@ static bool recovery_pass_needs_set(struct bch_fs *c, (r->passes_ratelimiting & BIT_ULL(pass))) return true; + if (rewind) + return true; + return false; } @@ -337,7 +343,6 @@ int __bch2_run_explicit_recovery_pass(struct bch_fs *c, struct bch_fs_recovery *r = &c->recovery; int ret = 0; - lockdep_assert_held(&c->sb_lock); bch2_printbuf_make_room(out, 1024); @@ -408,10 +413,8 @@ int bch2_run_explicit_recovery_pass(struct bch_fs *c, { int ret = 0; - scoped_guard(mutex, &c->sb_lock) { - if (!recovery_pass_needs_set(c, pass, &flags)) - return 0; - + if (recovery_pass_needs_set(c, pass, &flags)) { + guard(mutex)(&c->sb_lock); ret = __bch2_run_explicit_recovery_pass(c, out, pass, flags); bch2_write_super(c); }