From: Tan Hu <tan.hu@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:50:23 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: lib/flex_proportions.c: cleanup __fprop_inc_percpu_max
X-Git-Tag: v5.8-rc1~142^2~47
X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=63d7f8167fe65891617d5eca6314eca46029955c;p=linux-block.git

lib/flex_proportions.c: cleanup __fprop_inc_percpu_max

If the given type has fraction smaller than max_frac/FPROP_FRAC_BASE, the
code could be modified to call __fprop_inc_percpu() directly and easier to
understand.  After this patch, fprop_reflect_period_percpu() will be
called twice, and quicky return on pl->period == p->period test, so it
would not result to significant downside of performance.

Thanks for Jan's guidance.

Signed-off-by: Tan Hu <tan.hu@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <xue.zhihong@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Cc: <wang.liang82@zte.com.cn>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1589004753-27554-1-git-send-email-tan.hu@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/lib/flex_proportions.c b/lib/flex_proportions.c
index 7852bfff50b1..451543937524 100644
--- a/lib/flex_proportions.c
+++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c
@@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop_global *p,
 		if (numerator >
 		    (((u64)denominator) * max_frac) >> FPROP_FRAC_SHIFT)
 			return;
-	} else
-		fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
-	percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
-	percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
+	}
+
+	__fprop_inc_percpu(p, pl);
 }