From: Haifeng Xu Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 07:35:38 +0000 (+0000) Subject: mm, oom: do not check 0 mask in out_of_memory() X-Git-Tag: block-6.5-2023-07-03~14^2~349 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4822acb1369637938c1252d534d3356c5e313cde;p=linux-block.git mm, oom: do not check 0 mask in out_of_memory() Since commit 60e2793d440a ("mm, oom: do not trigger out_of_memory from the #PF"), no user sets gfp_mask to 0. Remove the 0 mask check and update the comments. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230508073538.1168-1-haifeng.xu@shopee.com Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Shakeel Butt Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 044e1eed720e..612b5597d3af 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -1130,12 +1130,10 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc) /* * The OOM killer does not compensate for IO-less reclaim. - * pagefault_out_of_memory lost its gfp context so we have to - * make sure exclude 0 mask - all other users should have at least - * ___GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM to get here. But mem_cgroup_oom() has to - * invoke the OOM killer even if it is a GFP_NOFS allocation. + * But mem_cgroup_oom() has to invoke the OOM killer even + * if it is a GFP_NOFS allocation. */ - if (oc->gfp_mask && !(oc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !is_memcg_oom(oc)) + if (!(oc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !is_memcg_oom(oc)) return true; /*