From: Abel Wu Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:00:24 +0000 (+0800) Subject: sock: Code cleanup on __sk_mem_raise_allocated() X-Git-Tag: io_uring-6.7-2023-11-10~40^2~61 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2def8ff3fdb6;p=linux-block.git sock: Code cleanup on __sk_mem_raise_allocated() Code cleanup for both better simplicity and readability. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Abel Wu Acked-by: Shakeel Butt Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231019120026.42215-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni --- diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 290165954379..43842520db86 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -3039,17 +3039,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_wait_data); */ int __sk_mem_raise_allocated(struct sock *sk, int size, int amt, int kind) { - bool memcg_charge = mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && sk->sk_memcg; + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled ? sk->sk_memcg : NULL; struct proto *prot = sk->sk_prot; - bool charged = true; + bool charged = false; long allocated; sk_memory_allocated_add(sk, amt); allocated = sk_memory_allocated(sk); - if (memcg_charge && - !(charged = mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(sk->sk_memcg, amt, - gfp_memcg_charge()))) - goto suppress_allocation; + + if (memcg) { + if (!mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(memcg, amt, gfp_memcg_charge())) + goto suppress_allocation; + charged = true; + } /* Under limit. */ if (allocated <= sk_prot_mem_limits(sk, 0)) { @@ -3104,8 +3106,8 @@ suppress_allocation: */ if (sk->sk_wmem_queued + size >= sk->sk_sndbuf) { /* Force charge with __GFP_NOFAIL */ - if (memcg_charge && !charged) { - mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(sk->sk_memcg, amt, + if (memcg && !charged) { + mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(memcg, amt, gfp_memcg_charge() | __GFP_NOFAIL); } return 1; @@ -3117,8 +3119,8 @@ suppress_allocation: sk_memory_allocated_sub(sk, amt); - if (memcg_charge && charged) - mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(sk->sk_memcg, amt); + if (charged) + mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(memcg, amt); return 0; }