From: NeilBrown Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 00:32:23 +0000 (+1100) Subject: md/raid5: separate large if clause out of fetch_block(). X-Git-Tag: v4.0-rc1~52^2~28 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2c58f06e6fe23905c4c586191bef0acc51536a9d;p=linux-block.git md/raid5: separate large if clause out of fetch_block(). fetch_block() has a very large and hard to read 'if' condition. Separate it into its own function so that it can be made more readable. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index 274db1834d43..5a980fe7c982 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -2895,14 +2895,14 @@ static int want_replace(struct stripe_head *sh, int disk_idx) * Returns 1 when no more member devices need to be checked, otherwise returns * 0 to tell the loop in handle_stripe_fill to continue */ -static int fetch_block(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s, - int disk_idx, int disks) + +static int need_this_block(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s, + int disk_idx, int disks) { struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[disk_idx]; struct r5dev *fdev[2] = { &sh->dev[s->failed_num[0]], &sh->dev[s->failed_num[1]] }; - /* is the data in this block needed, and can we get it? */ if (!test_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags) && !test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags) && (dev->toread || @@ -2919,7 +2919,18 @@ static int fetch_block(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s, && s->failed && s->to_write && (s->to_write - s->non_overwrite < sh->raid_conf->raid_disks - sh->raid_conf->max_degraded) && - (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags) || test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))))) { + (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags) || test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))))) + return 1; + return 0; +} + +static int fetch_block(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s, + int disk_idx, int disks) +{ + struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[disk_idx]; + + /* is the data in this block needed, and can we get it? */ + if (need_this_block(sh, s, disk_idx, disks)) { /* we would like to get this block, possibly by computing it, * otherwise read it if the backing disk is insync */