From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 13:59:44 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: bpf: Fix missed rcu read lock in bpf_task_under_cgroup()
X-Git-Tag: io_uring-6.7-2023-11-10~40^2~28^2~23
X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=29a7e00ffadddd8d68eff311de1bf12ae10687bb;p=linux-block.git

bpf: Fix missed rcu read lock in bpf_task_under_cgroup()

When employed within a sleepable program not under RCU protection, the
use of 'bpf_task_under_cgroup()' may trigger a warning in the kernel log,
particularly when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled:

  [ 1259.662357] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  [ 1259.662358] 6.5.0+ #33 Not tainted
  [ 1259.662360] -----------------------------
  [ 1259.662361] include/linux/cgroup.h:423 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

Other info that might help to debug this:

  [ 1259.662366] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  [ 1259.662368] 1 lock held by trace/72954:
  [ 1259.662369]  #0: ffffffffb5e3eda0 (rcu_read_lock_trace){....}-{0:0}, at: __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable+0x0/0xb0

Stack backtrace:

  [ 1259.662385] CPU: 50 PID: 72954 Comm: trace Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.5.0+ #33
  [ 1259.662391] Call Trace:
  [ 1259.662393]  <TASK>
  [ 1259.662395]  dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0x90
  [ 1259.662401]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
  [ 1259.662404]  lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x163/0x1b0
  [ 1259.662412]  task_css_set.part.0+0x23/0x30
  [ 1259.662417]  bpf_task_under_cgroup+0xe7/0xf0
  [ 1259.662422]  bpf_prog_7fffba481a3bcf88_lsm_run+0x5c/0x93
  [ 1259.662431]  bpf_trampoline_6442505574+0x60/0x1000
  [ 1259.662439]  bpf_lsm_bpf+0x5/0x20
  [ 1259.662443]  ? security_bpf+0x32/0x50
  [ 1259.662452]  __sys_bpf+0xe6/0xdd0
  [ 1259.662463]  __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x30
  [ 1259.662467]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [ 1259.662472]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
  [ 1259.662479] RIP: 0033:0x7f487baf8e29
  [...]
  [ 1259.662504]  </TASK>

This issue can be reproduced by executing a straightforward program, as
demonstrated below:

SEC("lsm.s/bpf")
int BPF_PROG(lsm_run, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
{
        struct cgroup *cgrp = NULL;
        struct task_struct *task;
        int ret = 0;

        if (cmd != BPF_LINK_CREATE)
                return 0;

        // The cgroup2 should be mounted first
        cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(1);
        if (!cgrp)
                goto out;
        task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
        if (bpf_task_under_cgroup(task, cgrp))
                ret = -1;
        bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);

out:
        return ret;
}

After running the program, if you subsequently execute another BPF program,
you will encounter the warning.

It's worth noting that task_under_cgroup_hierarchy() is also utilized by
bpf_current_task_under_cgroup(). However, bpf_current_task_under_cgroup()
doesn't exhibit this issue because it cannot be used in sleepable BPF
programs.

Fixes: b5ad4cdc46c7 ("bpf: Add bpf_task_under_cgroup() kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231007135945.4306-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
---

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 62a53ebfedf9..61f51dee8448 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2215,7 +2215,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup *bpf_cgroup_from_id(u64 cgid)
 __bpf_kfunc long bpf_task_under_cgroup(struct task_struct *task,
 				       struct cgroup *ancestor)
 {
-	return task_under_cgroup_hierarchy(task, ancestor);
+	long ret;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	ret = task_under_cgroup_hierarchy(task, ancestor);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ret;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUPS */