From: Breno Leitao Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 17:21:06 +0000 (-0700) Subject: memcg: always call cond_resched() after fn() X-Git-Tag: v6.15~2^2~2 X-Git-Url: https://git.kernel.dk/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=06717a7b6c86514dbd6ab322e8083ffaa4db5712;p=linux-block.git memcg: always call cond_resched() after fn() I am seeing soft lockup on certain machine types when a cgroup OOMs. This is happening because killing the process in certain machine might be very slow, which causes the soft lockup and RCU stalls. This happens usually when the cgroup has MANY processes and memory.oom.group is set. Example I am seeing in real production: [462012.244552] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 3370438 (crosvm) .... .... [462037.318059] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 4171372 (adb) .... [462037.348314] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#64 stuck for 26s! [stat_manager-ag:1618982] .... Quick look at why this is so slow, it seems to be related to serial flush for certain machine types. For all the crashes I saw, the target CPU was at console_flush_all(). In the case above, there are thousands of processes in the cgroup, and it is soft locking up before it reaches the 1024 limit in the code (which would call the cond_resched()). So, cond_resched() in 1024 blocks is not sufficient. Remove the counter-based conditional rescheduling logic and call cond_resched() unconditionally after each task iteration, after fn() is called. This avoids the lockup independently of how slow fn() is. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250523-memcg_fix-v1-1-ad3eafb60477@debian.org Fixes: ade81479c7dd ("memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process") Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao Suggested-by: Rik van Riel Acked-by: Shakeel Butt Cc: Michael van der Westhuizen Cc: Usama Arif Cc: Pavel Begunkov Cc: Chen Ridong Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index c96c1f2b9cf5..2d4d65f25fec 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1168,7 +1168,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, { struct mem_cgroup *iter; int ret = 0; - int i = 0; BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)); @@ -1178,10 +1177,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, css_task_iter_start(&iter->css, CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS, &it); while (!ret && (task = css_task_iter_next(&it))) { - /* Avoid potential softlockup warning */ - if ((++i & 1023) == 0) - cond_resched(); ret = fn(task, arg); + /* Avoid potential softlockup warning */ + cond_resched(); } css_task_iter_end(&it); if (ret) {