PCI: Fix lock symmetry in pci_slot_unlock()
authorIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Mon, 5 May 2025 11:54:12 +0000 (14:54 +0300)
committerBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Mon, 5 May 2025 18:39:59 +0000 (13:39 -0500)
The commit a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()")
made the lock function to call depend on dev->subordinate but left
pci_slot_unlock() unmodified creating locking asymmetry compared with
pci_slot_lock().

Because of the asymmetric lock handling, the same bridge device is unlocked
twice. First pci_bus_unlock() unlocks bus->self and then pci_slot_unlock()
will unconditionally unlock the same bridge device.

Move pci_dev_unlock() inside an else branch to match the logic in
pci_slot_lock().

Fixes: a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250505115412.37628-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
drivers/pci/pci.c

index 4d7c9f64ea24ec754a135a2585c99489cfa641a9..26507aa906d76cda0637fd655b735ac45a1df2e3 100644 (file)
@@ -5542,7 +5542,8 @@ static void pci_slot_unlock(struct pci_slot *slot)
                        continue;
                if (dev->subordinate)
                        pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
-               pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+               else
+                       pci_dev_unlock(dev);
        }
 }