xfrm: Fix RCU vs hash_resize_mutex lock inversion
authorFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:34:28 +0000 (15:34 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 11:22:16 +0000 (13:22 +0200)
commit 2580d3f40022642452dd8422bfb8c22e54cf84bb upstream.

xfrm_bydst_resize() calls synchronize_rcu() while holding
hash_resize_mutex. But then on PREEMPT_RT configurations,
xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype() may acquire that mutex while running in an
RCU read side critical section. This results in a deadlock.

In fact the scope of hash_resize_mutex is way beyond the purpose of
xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype() to just fetch a coherent and stable policy
for a given destination/direction, along with other details.

The lower level net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock, which among other things
protects per destination/direction references to policy entries, is
enough to serialize and benefit from priority inheritance against the
write side. As a bonus, it makes it officially a per network namespace
synchronization business where a policy table resize on namespace A
shouldn't block a policy lookup on namespace B.

Fixes: 77cc278f7b20 (xfrm: policy: Use sequence counters with associated lock)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
include/net/netns/xfrm.h
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

index b59d73d529ba717c12b5b79d4f3b34c58ec4ecfb..22e1bc72b979cd1b938824fbb1a4a6af448287de 100644 (file)
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct netns_xfrm {
 #endif
        spinlock_t              xfrm_state_lock;
        seqcount_t              xfrm_state_hash_generation;
+       seqcount_spinlock_t     xfrm_policy_hash_generation;
 
        spinlock_t xfrm_policy_lock;
        struct mutex xfrm_cfg_mutex;
index b74f28cabe24f245266f97f32428edc2cb68673b..3a9831c05ec71c7733be2b1742a82115a1a34cdf 100644 (file)
@@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo const __rcu *xfrm_policy_afinfo[AF_INET6 + 1]
                                                __read_mostly;
 
 static struct kmem_cache *xfrm_dst_cache __ro_after_init;
-static __read_mostly seqcount_mutex_t xfrm_policy_hash_generation;
 
 static struct rhashtable xfrm_policy_inexact_table;
 static const struct rhashtable_params xfrm_pol_inexact_params;
@@ -585,7 +584,7 @@ static void xfrm_bydst_resize(struct net *net, int dir)
                return;
 
        spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-       write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+       write_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 
        odst = rcu_dereference_protected(net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].table,
                                lockdep_is_held(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock));
@@ -596,7 +595,7 @@ static void xfrm_bydst_resize(struct net *net, int dir)
        rcu_assign_pointer(net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].table, ndst);
        net->xfrm.policy_bydst[dir].hmask = nhashmask;
 
-       write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+       write_seqcount_end(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
        spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 
        synchronize_rcu();
@@ -1245,7 +1244,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
        } while (read_seqretry(&net->xfrm.policy_hthresh.lock, seq));
 
        spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-       write_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+       write_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
 
        /* make sure that we can insert the indirect policies again before
         * we start with destructive action.
@@ -1354,7 +1353,7 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
 
 out_unlock:
        __xfrm_policy_inexact_flush(net);
-       write_seqcount_end(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+       write_seqcount_end(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
        spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 
        mutex_unlock(&hash_resize_mutex);
@@ -2095,9 +2094,9 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(struct net *net, u8 type,
        rcu_read_lock();
  retry:
        do {
-               sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
+               sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation);
                chain = policy_hash_direct(net, daddr, saddr, family, dir);
-       } while (read_seqcount_retry(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence));
+       } while (read_seqcount_retry(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence));
 
        ret = NULL;
        hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pol, chain, bydst) {
@@ -2128,7 +2127,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(struct net *net, u8 type,
        }
 
 skip_inexact:
-       if (read_seqcount_retry(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence))
+       if (read_seqcount_retry(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, sequence))
                goto retry;
 
        if (ret && !xfrm_pol_hold_rcu(ret))
@@ -4123,6 +4122,7 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(struct net *net)
        /* Initialize the per-net locks here */
        spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock);
        spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+       seqcount_spinlock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_hash_generation, &net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
        mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex);
 
        rv = xfrm_statistics_init(net);
@@ -4167,7 +4167,6 @@ void __init xfrm_init(void)
 {
        register_pernet_subsys(&xfrm_net_ops);
        xfrm_dev_init();
-       seqcount_mutex_init(&xfrm_policy_hash_generation, &hash_resize_mutex);
        xfrm_input_init();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ESPINTCP