iio: accel: da280: Stop using ACPI_PTR()
authorJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Sun, 31 Dec 2023 18:34:51 +0000 (18:34 +0000)
committerJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Tue, 23 Jan 2024 22:06:54 +0000 (22:06 +0000)
In general using ACPI_PTR() leads to more fragile code for a very
minor saving in storage in the case of !CONFIG_ACPI so in IIO we
prefer not to use it if the only ACPI specific code is the acpi_device_id
table.

In this case will also suppress a unused variable warning.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302142222.vVU0E4eu-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231231183514.566609-2-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
drivers/iio/accel/da280.c

index 756e2ea7c0562107deaaccac040245e7786b3fd0..9922868288449cc9f85cf6cf53a351d84c5acc49 100644 (file)
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, da280_i2c_id);
 static struct i2c_driver da280_driver = {
        .driver = {
                .name = "da280",
-               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(da280_acpi_match),
+               .acpi_match_table = da280_acpi_match,
                .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&da280_pm_ops),
        },
        .probe          = da280_probe,