sched/fair: Improve the accuracy of sched_stat_wait statistics
authorjun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
Thu, 15 Oct 2020 06:48:46 +0000 (14:48 +0800)
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:00:28 +0000 (11:00 +0100)
When the sched_schedstat changes from 0 to 1, some sched se maybe
already in the runqueue, the se->statistics.wait_start will be 0.
So it will let the (rq_of(cfs_rq)) - se->statistics.wait_start)
wrong. We need to avoid this scenario.

Signed-off-by: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201015064846.19809-1-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com
kernel/sched/fair.c

index 290f9e38378c8899447f281a067c3600a8cf6599..b9368d123451d358aac2cf48c1d5298fb1931c16 100644 (file)
@@ -906,6 +906,15 @@ update_stats_wait_end(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
        if (!schedstat_enabled())
                return;
 
+       /*
+        * When the sched_schedstat changes from 0 to 1, some sched se
+        * maybe already in the runqueue, the se->statistics.wait_start
+        * will be 0.So it will let the delta wrong. We need to avoid this
+        * scenario.
+        */
+       if (unlikely(!schedstat_val(se->statistics.wait_start)))
+               return;
+
        delta = rq_clock(rq_of(cfs_rq)) - schedstat_val(se->statistics.wait_start);
 
        if (entity_is_task(se)) {