btrfs: reduce size and overhead of extent_map_block_end()
authorFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:21:22 +0000 (15:21 +0100)
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:51:12 +0000 (16:51 +0200)
At extent_map_block_end() we are calling the inline functions
extent_map_block_start() and extent_map_block_len() multiple times, which
results in expanding their code multiple times, increasing the compiled
code size and repeating the computations those functions do.

Improve this by caching their results in local variables.

The size of the module before this change:

   $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
      text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   1755770  163800   16920 1936490  1d8c6a fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

And after this change:

   $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
      text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   1755656  163800   16920 1936376  1d8bf8 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c

index 10ac5f657e388981a40ccc5dad7d4420570b9091..25d191f1ac10f49b8b51dd24ab1e6edaf4b7de75 100644 (file)
@@ -192,10 +192,13 @@ static inline u64 extent_map_block_len(const struct extent_map *em)
 
 static inline u64 extent_map_block_end(const struct extent_map *em)
 {
-       if (extent_map_block_start(em) + extent_map_block_len(em) <
-           extent_map_block_start(em))
+       const u64 block_start = extent_map_block_start(em);
+       const u64 block_end = block_start + extent_map_block_len(em);
+
+       if (block_end < block_start)
                return (u64)-1;
-       return extent_map_block_start(em) + extent_map_block_len(em);
+
+       return block_end;
 }
 
 static bool can_merge_extent_map(const struct extent_map *em)