We should have 'n', then 'size', not the opposite.
This is harmless because the 2 values are just multiplied, but having
the correct order silence a (unpublished yet) smatch warning.
While at it use '*tun_seg' instead '*seg'. The both variable have the same
type, so the result is the same, but it lokks more logical.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Tested-by: Gurucharan <gurucharanx.g@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
if (!seg)
return -ENOMEM;
- tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
+ tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, sizeof(*tun_seg),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tun_seg) {
devm_kfree(dev, seg);
if (!seg)
return -ENOMEM;
- tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
+ tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX, sizeof(*tun_seg),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tun_seg) {
devm_kfree(dev, seg);