sched/fair: Use rq_lock/unlock in online_fair_sched_group
authorPhil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:37:49 +0000 (09:37 -0400)
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:45:34 +0000 (14:45 +0200)
Enabling WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK in /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features causes
warning to fire in update_rq_clock. This seems to be caused by onlining
a new fair sched group not using the rq lock wrappers.

  [] rq->clock_update_flags & RQCF_UPDATED
  [] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 54385 at kernel/sched/core.c:210 update_rq_clock+0xec/0x150

  [] Call Trace:
  []  online_fair_sched_group+0x53/0x100
  []  cpu_cgroup_css_online+0x16/0x20
  []  online_css+0x1c/0x60
  []  cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x231/0x3b0
  []  cgroup_mkdir+0x41b/0x530
  []  kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x61/0xa0
  []  vfs_mkdir+0x108/0x1a0
  []  do_mkdirat+0x77/0xe0
  []  do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1d0
  []  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Using the wrappers in online_fair_sched_group instead of the raw locking
removes this warning.

[ tglx: Use rq_*lock_irq() ]

Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801133749.11033-1-pauld@redhat.com
kernel/sched/fair.c

index 19c58599e9673f213027720793d3b3134946839e..1054d2cf6aaa9f1c96c2368b1f5941650a53da05 100644 (file)
@@ -10281,18 +10281,18 @@ err:
 void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
 {
        struct sched_entity *se;
+       struct rq_flags rf;
        struct rq *rq;
        int i;
 
        for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
                rq = cpu_rq(i);
                se = tg->se[i];
-
-               raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
+               rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
                update_rq_clock(rq);
                attach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
                sync_throttle(tg, i);
-               raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
+               rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
        }
 }