Just to make things clearer, return TEST_FAIL (-1) instead of an open
coded -1.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZdepeMsjagbf1ufD@x1
#include <stdbool.h>
+enum {
+ TEST_OK = 0,
+ TEST_FAIL = -1,
+ TEST_SKIP = -2,
+};
+
#define TEST_ASSERT_VAL(text, cond) \
do { \
if (!(cond)) { \
pr_debug("FAILED %s:%d %s\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, text); \
- return -1; \
+ return TEST_FAIL; \
} \
} while (0)
if (val != expected) { \
pr_debug("FAILED %s:%d %s (%d != %d)\n", \
__FILE__, __LINE__, text, val, expected); \
- return -1; \
+ return TEST_FAIL; \
} \
} while (0)
-enum {
- TEST_OK = 0,
- TEST_FAIL = -1,
- TEST_SKIP = -2,
-};
-
struct test_suite;
typedef int (*test_fnptr)(struct test_suite *, int);