ability to hook into a secondary subsystem while allowing the user to
configure that subsystem out without also having to unset these drivers.
- Note: If the combination of FOO=y and BAZ=m causes a link error,
- you can guard the function call with IS_REACHABLE()::
-
- foo_init()
- {
- if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_BAZ))
- baz_register(&foo);
- ...
- }
-
Note: If the feature provided by BAZ is highly desirable for FOO,
FOO should imply not only BAZ, but also its dependency BAR::
depends on BAR || !BAR
This means that there is either a dependency on BAR that disallows
-the combination of FOO=y with BAR=m, or BAR is completely disabled.
+the combination of FOO=y with BAR=m, or BAR is completely disabled. The BAR
+module must provide all the stubs for !BAR case.
+
For a more formalized approach if there are multiple drivers that have
the same dependency, a helper symbol can be used, like::
config BAR_OPTIONAL
def_tristate BAR || !BAR
+Much less favorable way to express optional dependency is IS_REACHABLE() within
+the module code, useful for example when the module BAR does not provide
+!BAR stubs::
+
+ foo_init()
+ {
+ if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_BAR))
+ bar_register(&foo);
+ ...
+ }
+
+IS_REACHABLE() is generally discouraged, because the code will be silently
+discarded, when CONFIG_BAR=m and this code is built-in. This is not what users
+usually expect when enabling BAR as module.
+
Kconfig recursive dependency limitations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~