scsi: ibmvfc: Fix erroneous use of rtas_busy_delay with hcall return code

Commit 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ
during cleanup") wrongly changed the busy loop check to use
rtas_busy_delay() instead of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). The busy return
codes for RTAS and hypercalls are not the same.

Fix this issue by restoring the use of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY().

Fixes: 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ  during cleanup")
Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921225435.3537728-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
index 2bfeeb9ace01855228e835d53b7d2b13c049bacd..30baa046ae5b6cbcb76c97ee954f0917f19bf519 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
 #include <linux/bsg-lib.h>
 #include <asm/firmware.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
-#include <asm/rtas.h>
 #include <asm/vio.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
@@ -5952,7 +5951,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
 irq_failed:
        do {
                rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie);
-       } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc));
+       } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc));
 reg_failed:
        LEAVE;
        return rc;