Patch series "mm: zswap: simplify zswap_swapoff()", v2.
These patches aim to simplify zswap_swapoff() by removing the unnecessary
trees cleanup code. Patch 1 makes sure that the order of operations
during swapoff is enforced correctly, making sure the simplification in
patch 2 is correct in a future-proof manner.
This patch (of 2):
In swap_range_free(), we update inuse_pages then do some cleanups (arch
invalidation, zswap invalidation, swap cache cleanups, etc). During
swapoff, try_to_unuse() checks that inuse_pages is 0 to make sure all swap
entries are freed. Make sure we only update inuse_pages after we are done
with the cleanups in swap_range_free(), and use the proper memory barriers
to enforce it. This makes sure that code following try_to_unuse() can
safely assume that swap_range_free() ran for all entries in thr swapfile
(e.g. swap cache cleanup, zswap_swapoff()).
In practice, this currently isn't a problem because swap_range_free() is
called with the swap info lock held, and the swapoff code happens to spin
for that after try_to_unuse(). However, this seems fragile and
unintentional, so make it more relable and future-proof. This also
facilitates a following simplification of zswap_swapoff().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240124045113.415378-1-yosryahmed@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240124045113.415378-2-yosryahmed@google.com
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
if (was_full && (si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK))
add_to_avail_list(si);
}
- atomic_long_add(nr_entries, &nr_swap_pages);
- WRITE_ONCE(si->inuse_pages, si->inuse_pages - nr_entries);
if (si->flags & SWP_BLKDEV)
swap_slot_free_notify =
si->bdev->bd_disk->fops->swap_slot_free_notify;
offset++;
}
clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(si->type, begin, end);
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure that try_to_unuse() observes si->inuse_pages reaching 0
+ * only after the above cleanups are done.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ atomic_long_add(nr_entries, &nr_swap_pages);
+ WRITE_ONCE(si->inuse_pages, si->inuse_pages - nr_entries);
}
static void set_cluster_next(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long next)
unsigned int i;
if (!READ_ONCE(si->inuse_pages))
- return 0;
+ goto success;
retry:
retval = shmem_unuse(type);
return -EINTR;
}
+success:
+ /*
+ * Make sure that further cleanups after try_to_unuse() returns happen
+ * after swap_range_free() reduces si->inuse_pages to 0.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
return 0;
}