Currently if __tracing_resize_ring_buffer() returns an error, the
tracing_resize_ringbuffer() returns -ENOMEM. But it may not be a memory
issue that caused the function to fail. If the ring buffer is memory
mapped, then the resizing of the ring buffer will be disabled. But if the
user tries to resize the buffer, it will get an -ENOMEM returned, which is
confusing because there is plenty of memory. The actual error returned was
-EBUSY, which would make much more sense to the user.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250213134132.7e4505d7@gandalf.local.home
Fixes:
117c39200d9d7 ("ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
ssize_t tracing_resize_ring_buffer(struct trace_array *tr,
unsigned long size, int cpu_id)
{
- int ret;
-
guard(mutex)(&trace_types_lock);
if (cpu_id != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
return -EINVAL;
}
- ret = __tracing_resize_ring_buffer(tr, size, cpu_id);
- if (ret < 0)
- ret = -ENOMEM;
-
- return ret;
+ return __tracing_resize_ring_buffer(tr, size, cpu_id);
}
static void update_last_data(struct trace_array *tr)