Moving an extent to data fork can cause a sub-interval of an existing
extent to be unmapped. This will increase extent count by 1. Mapping in
the new extent can increase the extent count by 1 again i.e.
| Old extent | New extent | Old extent |
Hence number of extents increases by 2.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
#define XFS_IEXT_WRITE_UNWRITTEN_CNT (2)
+/*
+ * Moving an extent to data fork can cause a sub-interval of an existing extent
+ * to be unmapped. This will increase extent count by 1. Mapping in the new
+ * extent can increase the extent count by 1 again i.e.
+ * | Old extent | New extent | Old extent |
+ * Hence number of extents increases by 2.
+ */
+#define XFS_IEXT_REFLINK_END_COW_CNT (2)
+
/*
* Fork handling.
*/
xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
+ error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(ip, XFS_DATA_FORK,
+ XFS_IEXT_REFLINK_END_COW_CNT);
+ if (error)
+ goto out_cancel;
+
/*
* In case of racing, overlapping AIO writes no COW extents might be
* left by the time I/O completes for the loser of the race. In that