drm/amdgpu: fix incorrect use of amdgpu_irq_add_id in si_dma.c
authorChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:15:44 +0000 (16:15 +0200)
committerAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:07:05 +0000 (17:07 -0500)
Adding a second irq source because of a different src_id is actually a
bug.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dma.c

index d17503f0df8ea15a83313984848b140e94a7f28f..500113ec65caaf63a3ba6cc6d1f385b211bf34dc 100644 (file)
@@ -46,10 +46,6 @@ struct amdgpu_sdma_instance {
 
 struct amdgpu_sdma {
        struct amdgpu_sdma_instance instance[AMDGPU_MAX_SDMA_INSTANCES];
-#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_SI
-       //SI DMA has a difference trap irq number for the second engine
-       struct amdgpu_irq_src   trap_irq_1;
-#endif
        struct amdgpu_irq_src   trap_irq;
        struct amdgpu_irq_src   illegal_inst_irq;
        int                     num_instances;
index d4ceaf440f26a67ebf40efa85f1318b44334609e..adbaea6da0d71a28a5b2cc510614fcde9692d9b6 100644 (file)
@@ -502,12 +502,14 @@ static int si_dma_sw_init(void *handle)
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
 
        /* DMA0 trap event */
-       r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 224, &adev->sdma.trap_irq);
+       r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 224,
+                             &adev->sdma.trap_irq);
        if (r)
                return r;
 
        /* DMA1 trap event */
-       r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 244, &adev->sdma.trap_irq_1);
+       r = amdgpu_irq_add_id(adev, AMDGPU_IRQ_CLIENTID_LEGACY, 244,
+                             &adev->sdma.trap_irq);
        if (r)
                return r;
 
@@ -649,17 +651,10 @@ static int si_dma_process_trap_irq(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
                                      struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
                                      struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
 {
-       amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[0].ring);
-
-       return 0;
-}
-
-static int si_dma_process_trap_irq_1(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
-                                     struct amdgpu_irq_src *source,
-                                     struct amdgpu_iv_entry *entry)
-{
-       amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[1].ring);
-
+       if (entry->src_id == 224)
+               amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[0].ring);
+       else
+               amdgpu_fence_process(&adev->sdma.instance[1].ring);
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -786,11 +781,6 @@ static const struct amdgpu_irq_src_funcs si_dma_trap_irq_funcs = {
        .process = si_dma_process_trap_irq,
 };
 
-static const struct amdgpu_irq_src_funcs si_dma_trap_irq_funcs_1 = {
-       .set = si_dma_set_trap_irq_state,
-       .process = si_dma_process_trap_irq_1,
-};
-
 static const struct amdgpu_irq_src_funcs si_dma_illegal_inst_irq_funcs = {
        .process = si_dma_process_illegal_inst_irq,
 };
@@ -799,7 +789,6 @@ static void si_dma_set_irq_funcs(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 {
        adev->sdma.trap_irq.num_types = AMDGPU_SDMA_IRQ_LAST;
        adev->sdma.trap_irq.funcs = &si_dma_trap_irq_funcs;
-       adev->sdma.trap_irq_1.funcs = &si_dma_trap_irq_funcs_1;
        adev->sdma.illegal_inst_irq.funcs = &si_dma_illegal_inst_irq_funcs;
 }