In 'cfg80211_free_coalesce', '&coalesce->rules[i]' is a pointer
to VLA member of 'struct cfg80211_coalesce' and should never be NULL,
so redundant check may be dropped.
I think this is correct, but I haven't tested it seriously.
Compile tested only.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kandybka <d.kandybka@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241003095912.218465-1-d.kandybka@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
for (i = 0; i < coalesce->n_rules; i++) {
rule = &coalesce->rules[i];
- if (!rule)
- continue;
for (j = 0; j < rule->n_patterns; j++)
kfree(rule->patterns[j].mask);
kfree(rule->patterns);