Currently, the pos pointer in bpf iterator map/task/task_file
seq_ops->start() is always incremented.
This is incorrect. It should be increased only if
*pos is 0 (for SEQ_START_TOKEN) since these start()
function actually returns the first real object.
If *pos is not 0, it merely found the object
based on the state in seq->private, and not really
advancing the *pos. This patch fixed this issue
by only incrementing *pos if it is 0.
Note that the old *pos calculation, although not
correct, does not affect correctness of bpf_iter
as bpf_iter seq_file->read() does not support llseek.
This patch also renamed "mid" in bpf_map iterator
seq_file private data to "map_id" for better clarity.
Fixes:
6086d29def80 ("bpf: Add bpf_map iterator")
Fixes:
eaaacd23910f ("bpf: Add task and task/file iterator targets")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200722195156.4029817-1-yhs@fb.com
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
struct bpf_iter_seq_map_info {
- u32 mid;
+ u32 map_id;
};
static void *bpf_map_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
struct bpf_iter_seq_map_info *info = seq->private;
struct bpf_map *map;
- map = bpf_map_get_curr_or_next(&info->mid);
+ map = bpf_map_get_curr_or_next(&info->map_id);
if (!map)
return NULL;
- ++*pos;
+ if (*pos == 0)
+ ++*pos;
return map;
}
static void *bpf_map_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct bpf_iter_seq_map_info *info = seq->private;
- struct bpf_map *map;
++*pos;
- ++info->mid;
+ ++info->map_id;
bpf_map_put((struct bpf_map *)v);
- map = bpf_map_get_curr_or_next(&info->mid);
- if (!map)
- return NULL;
-
- return map;
+ return bpf_map_get_curr_or_next(&info->map_id);
}
struct bpf_iter__bpf_map {
if (!task)
return NULL;
- ++*pos;
+ if (*pos == 0)
+ ++*pos;
return task;
}
return NULL;
}
- ++*pos;
+ if (*pos == 0)
+ ++*pos;
info->task = task;
info->files = files;