hamradio: 6pack: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in decode_std_command()
authorXu Jia <xujia39@huawei.com>
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:31:06 +0000 (17:31 +0800)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:39:46 +0000 (11:39 +0100)
Hulk Robot reports incorrect sp->rx_count_cooked value in decode_std_command().
This should be caused by the subtracting from sp->rx_count_cooked before.
It seems that sp->rx_count_cooked value is changed to 0, which bypassed the
previous judgment.

The situation is shown below:

         (Thread 1) |  (Thread 2)
decode_std_command() | resync_tnc()
... |
if (rest == 2) |
sp->rx_count_cooked -= 2; |
else if (rest == 3) | ...
| sp->rx_count_cooked = 0;
sp->rx_count_cooked -= 1; |
for (i = 0; i < sp->rx_count_cooked; i++) // report error
checksum += sp->cooked_buf[i];

sp->rx_count_cooked is a shared variable but is not protected by a lock.
The same applies to sp->rx_count. This patch adds a lock to fix the bug.

The fail log is shown below:
=======================================================================
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c:925:31
index 400 is out of range for type 'unsigned char [400]'
CPU: 3 PID: 7433 Comm: kworker/u10:1 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc5-00163-g4b97bac0756a #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134
 ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x50
 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x62/0x6c
 sixpack_receive_buf+0xfda/0x1330
 tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0x13e/0x180
 tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x6d/0xa0
 flush_to_ldisc+0x213/0x3f0
 process_one_work+0x98f/0x1620
 worker_thread+0x665/0x1080
 kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
 ...

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xu Jia <xujia39@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c

index 45c3c4a1101b7f9a20d2b3d79e986aa453d7a640..9fb56752422075be4543767ad80429bcfe096f86 100644 (file)
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct sixpack {
 
        unsigned int            rx_count;
        unsigned int            rx_count_cooked;
+       spinlock_t              rxlock;
 
        int                     mtu;            /* Our mtu (to spot changes!) */
        int                     buffsize;       /* Max buffers sizes */
@@ -565,6 +566,7 @@ static int sixpack_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
        sp->dev = dev;
 
        spin_lock_init(&sp->lock);
+       spin_lock_init(&sp->rxlock);
        refcount_set(&sp->refcnt, 1);
        init_completion(&sp->dead);
 
@@ -913,6 +915,7 @@ static void decode_std_command(struct sixpack *sp, unsigned char cmd)
                        sp->led_state = 0x60;
                        /* fill trailing bytes with zeroes */
                        sp->tty->ops->write(sp->tty, &sp->led_state, 1);
+                       spin_lock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
                        rest = sp->rx_count;
                        if (rest != 0)
                                 for (i = rest; i <= 3; i++)
@@ -930,6 +933,7 @@ static void decode_std_command(struct sixpack *sp, unsigned char cmd)
                                sp_bump(sp, 0);
                        }
                        sp->rx_count_cooked = 0;
+                       spin_unlock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
                }
                break;
        case SIXP_TX_URUN: printk(KERN_DEBUG "6pack: TX underrun\n");
@@ -959,8 +963,11 @@ sixpack_decode(struct sixpack *sp, const unsigned char *pre_rbuff, int count)
                        decode_prio_command(sp, inbyte);
                else if ((inbyte & SIXP_STD_CMD_MASK) != 0)
                        decode_std_command(sp, inbyte);
-               else if ((sp->status & SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK) == SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK)
+               else if ((sp->status & SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK) == SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK) {
+                       spin_lock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
                        decode_data(sp, inbyte);
+                       spin_unlock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
+               }
        }
 }