mm/mempolicy: protect task interleave functions with tsk->mems_allowed_seq
authorGregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:02:38 +0000 (12:02 -0500)
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:24:47 +0000 (10:24 -0800)
In the event of rebind, pol->nodemask can change at the same time as an
allocation occurs.  We can detect this with tsk->mems_allowed_seq and
prevent a miscount or an allocation failure from occurring.

The same thing happens in the allocators to detect failure, but this can
prevent spurious failures in a much smaller critical section.

[gourry.memverge@gmail.com: weighted interleave checks wrong parameter]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240206192853.3589-1-gregory.price@memverge.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202170238.90004-5-gregory.price@memverge.com
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Hasan Al Maruf <Hasan.Maruf@amd.com>
Cc: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Cc: Hyeongtak Ji <hyeongtak.ji@sk.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
Cc: Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@micron.com>
Cc: Srinivasulu Thanneeru <sthanneeru.opensrc@micron.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
mm/mempolicy.c

index a8db92c236974d002e75f1b40d3e730d066b7631..56f9a6ed939adf8c6873a00342daf586482239ab 100644 (file)
@@ -1874,11 +1874,17 @@ bool apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
 
 static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
 {
-       unsigned int node = current->il_prev;
+       unsigned int node;
+       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
 
+retry:
+       /* to prevent miscount use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
+       cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+       node = current->il_prev;
        if (!current->il_weight || !node_isset(node, policy->nodes)) {
                node = next_node_in(node, policy->nodes);
-               /* can only happen if nodemask is being rebound */
+               if (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie))
+                       goto retry;
                if (node == MAX_NUMNODES)
                        return node;
                current->il_prev = node;
@@ -1892,8 +1898,14 @@ static unsigned int weighted_interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
 static unsigned int interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
 {
        unsigned int nid;
+       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
+
+       /* to prevent miscount, use tsk->mems_allowed_seq to detect rebind */
+       do {
+               cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+               nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
+       } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));
 
-       nid = next_node_in(current->il_prev, policy->nodes);
        if (nid < MAX_NUMNODES)
                current->il_prev = nid;
        return nid;
@@ -2370,6 +2382,7 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
                struct page **page_array)
 {
        struct task_struct *me = current;
+       unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
        unsigned long total_allocated = 0;
        unsigned long nr_allocated = 0;
        unsigned long rounds;
@@ -2387,7 +2400,13 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_array_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
        if (!nr_pages)
                return 0;
 
-       nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
+       /* read the nodes onto the stack, retry if done during rebind */
+       do {
+               cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
+               nnodes = read_once_policy_nodemask(pol, &nodes);
+       } while (read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie));
+
+       /* if the nodemask has become invalid, we cannot do anything */
        if (!nnodes)
                return 0;