cifs: simplify how we handle credits in compound_send_recv()
authorRonnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:18:58 +0000 (12:18 +1000)
committerSteve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:32:35 +0000 (19:32 -0500)
Since we can now wait for multiple requests atomically in
wait_for_free_request() we can now greatly simplify the handling
of the credits in this function.

This fixes a potential deadlock where many concurrent compound requests
could each have reserved 1 or 2 credits each but are all blocked
waiting for the final credits they need to be able to issue the requests
to the server.

Set a default timeout of 60 seconds for compounded requests.

Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
fs/cifs/transport.c

index 8731cfa6602628b7dc434da88976ffc881aa0edd..1de8e996e566fd0bcc5642dcaba7bd88fed191ad 100644 (file)
@@ -606,6 +606,31 @@ wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, const int flags,
                                     instance);
 }
 
+static int
+wait_for_compound_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, int num,
+                         const int flags, unsigned int *instance)
+{
+       int *credits;
+
+       credits = server->ops->get_credits_field(server, flags & CIFS_OP_MASK);
+
+       spin_lock(&server->req_lock);
+       if (*credits < num) {
+               /*
+                * Return immediately if not too many requests in flight since
+                * we will likely be stuck on waiting for credits.
+                */
+               if (server->in_flight < num - *credits) {
+                       spin_unlock(&server->req_lock);
+                       return -ENOTSUPP;
+               }
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&server->req_lock);
+
+       return wait_for_free_credits(server, num, 60000, flags,
+                                    instance);
+}
+
 int
 cifs_wait_mtu_credits(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, unsigned int size,
                      unsigned int *num, struct cifs_credits *credits)
@@ -934,7 +959,6 @@ compound_send_recv(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
                { .value = 0, .instance = 0 }
        };
        unsigned int instance;
-       unsigned int first_instance = 0;
        char *buf;
 
        optype = flags & CIFS_OP_MASK;
@@ -950,80 +974,24 @@ compound_send_recv(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
        if (ses->server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting)
                return -ENOENT;
 
-       spin_lock(&ses->server->req_lock);
-       if (ses->server->credits < num_rqst) {
-               /*
-                * Return immediately if not too many requests in flight since
-                * we will likely be stuck on waiting for credits.
-                */
-               if (ses->server->in_flight < num_rqst - ses->server->credits) {
-                       spin_unlock(&ses->server->req_lock);
-                       return -ENOTSUPP;
-               }
-       } else {
-               /* enough credits to send the whole compounded request */
-               ses->server->credits -= num_rqst;
-               ses->server->in_flight += num_rqst;
-               first_instance = ses->server->reconnect_instance;
-       }
-       spin_unlock(&ses->server->req_lock);
-
-       if (first_instance) {
-               cifs_dbg(FYI, "Acquired %d credits at once\n", num_rqst);
-               for (i = 0; i < num_rqst; i++) {
-                       credits[i].value = 1;
-                       credits[i].instance = first_instance;
-               }
-               goto setup_rqsts;
-       }
-
        /*
-        * There are not enough credits to send the whole compound request but
-        * there are requests in flight that may bring credits from the server.
+        * Wait for all the requests to become available.
         * This approach still leaves the possibility to be stuck waiting for
         * credits if the server doesn't grant credits to the outstanding
-        * requests. This should be fixed by returning immediately and letting
-        * a caller fallback to sequential commands instead of compounding.
-        * Ensure we obtain 1 credit per request in the compound chain.
+        * requests and if the client is completely idle, not generating any
+        * other requests.
+        * This can be handled by the eventual session reconnect.
         */
-       for (i = 0; i < num_rqst; i++) {
-               rc = wait_for_free_request(ses->server, flags, &instance);
-
-               if (rc == 0) {
-                       credits[i].value = 1;
-                       credits[i].instance = instance;
-                       /*
-                        * All parts of the compound chain must get credits from
-                        * the same session, otherwise we may end up using more
-                        * credits than the server granted. If there were
-                        * reconnects in between, return -EAGAIN and let callers
-                        * handle it.
-                        */
-                       if (i == 0)
-                               first_instance = instance;
-                       else if (first_instance != instance) {
-                               i++;
-                               rc = -EAGAIN;
-                       }
-               }
+       rc = wait_for_compound_request(ses->server, num_rqst, flags,
+                                      &instance);
+       if (rc)
+               return rc;
 
-               if (rc) {
-                       /*
-                        * We haven't sent an SMB packet to the server yet but
-                        * we already obtained credits for i requests in the
-                        * compound chain - need to return those credits back
-                        * for future use. Note that we need to call add_credits
-                        * multiple times to match the way we obtained credits
-                        * in the first place and to account for in flight
-                        * requests correctly.
-                        */
-                       for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
-                               add_credits(ses->server, &credits[j], optype);
-                       return rc;
-               }
+       for (i = 0; i < num_rqst; i++) {
+               credits[i].value = 1;
+               credits[i].instance = instance;
        }
 
-setup_rqsts:
        /*
         * Make sure that we sign in the same order that we send on this socket
         * and avoid races inside tcp sendmsg code that could cause corruption
@@ -1034,14 +1002,12 @@ setup_rqsts:
 
        /*
         * All the parts of the compound chain belong obtained credits from the
-        * same session (see the appropriate checks above). In the same time
-        * there might be reconnects after those checks but before we acquired
-        * the srv_mutex. We can not use credits obtained from the previous
+        * same session. We can not use credits obtained from the previous
         * session to send this request. Check if there were reconnects after
         * we obtained credits and return -EAGAIN in such cases to let callers
         * handle it.
         */
-       if (first_instance != ses->server->reconnect_instance) {
+       if (instance != ses->server->reconnect_instance) {
                mutex_unlock(&ses->server->srv_mutex);
                for (j = 0; j < num_rqst; j++)
                        add_credits(ses->server, &credits[j], optype);