Do a remote TLB flush if installing a leaf SPTE overwrites an existing
leaf SPTE (with the same target pfn, which is enforced by a BUG() in
handle_changed_spte()) and clears the MMU-Writable bit. Since the TDP MMU
passes ACC_ALL to make_spte(), i.e. always requests a Writable SPTE, the
only scenario in which make_spte() should create a !MMU-Writable SPTE is
if the gfn is write-tracked or if KVM is prefetching a SPTE.
When write-protecting for write-tracking, KVM must hold mmu_lock for write,
i.e. can't race with a vCPU faulting in the SPTE. And when prefetching a
SPTE, the TDP MMU takes care to avoid clobbering a shadow-present SPTE,
i.e. it should be impossible to replace a MMU-writable SPTE with a
!MMU-writable SPTE when handling a TDP MMU fault.
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241011021051.1557902-9-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(vcpu->kvm, iter, new_spte))
return RET_PF_RETRY;
else if (is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
- !is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level))
+ (!is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level) ||
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(is_mmu_writable_spte(iter->old_spte) &&
+ !is_mmu_writable_spte(new_spte))))
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_gfn(vcpu->kvm, iter->gfn, iter->level);
/*