block: fix deadlock between bd_link_disk_holder and partition scan

'open_mutex' of gendisk is used to protect open/close block devices. But
in bd_link_disk_holder(), it is used to protect the creation of symlink
between holding disk and slave bdev, which introduces some issues.

When bd_link_disk_holder() is called, the driver is usually in the process
of initialization/modification and may suspend submitting io. At this
time, any io hold 'open_mutex', such as scanning partitions, can cause
deadlocks. For example, in raid:

T1                              T2
bdev_open_by_dev
 lock open_mutex [1]
 ...
  efi_partition
  ...
   md_submit_bio
				md_ioctl mddev_syspend
				  -> suspend all io
				 md_add_new_disk
				  bind_rdev_to_array
				   bd_link_disk_holder
				    try lock open_mutex [2]
    md_handle_request
     -> wait mddev_resume

T1 scan partition, T2 add a new device to raid. T1 waits for T2 to resume
mddev, but T2 waits for open_mutex held by T1. Deadlock occurs.

Fix it by introducing a local mutex 'blk_holder_mutex' to replace
'open_mutex'.

Fixes: 1b0a2d950ee2 ("md: use new apis to suspend array for ioctls involed array reconfiguration")
Reported-by: mgperkow@gmail.com
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218459
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221090122.1281868-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/block/holder.c b/block/holder.c
index 37d18c13d958188ba35214fc842db985d0e908b3..791091a7eac234d79970aca9b32a5d317b085483 100644 (file)
--- a/block/holder.c
+++ b/block/holder.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ struct bd_holder_disk {
        int                     refcnt;
 };
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(blk_holder_mutex);
+
 static struct bd_holder_disk *bd_find_holder_disk(struct block_device *bdev,
                                                  struct gendisk *disk)
 {
@@ -80,7 +82,7 @@ int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
        kobject_get(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
        mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_disk->open_mutex);
 
-       mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
+       mutex_lock(&blk_holder_mutex);
        WARN_ON_ONCE(!bdev->bd_holder);
 
        holder = bd_find_holder_disk(bdev, disk);
@@ -108,7 +110,7 @@ int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
                goto out_del_symlink;
        list_add(&holder->list, &disk->slave_bdevs);
 
-       mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
+       mutex_unlock(&blk_holder_mutex);
        return 0;
 
 out_del_symlink:
@@ -116,7 +118,7 @@ out_del_symlink:
 out_free_holder:
        kfree(holder);
 out_unlock:
-       mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
+       mutex_unlock(&blk_holder_mutex);
        if (ret)
                kobject_put(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
        return ret;
@@ -140,7 +142,7 @@ void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!disk->slave_dir))
                return;
 
-       mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex);
+       mutex_lock(&blk_holder_mutex);
        holder = bd_find_holder_disk(bdev, disk);
        if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(holder == NULL) && !--holder->refcnt) {
                del_symlink(disk->slave_dir, bdev_kobj(bdev));
@@ -149,6 +151,6 @@ void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
                list_del_init(&holder->list);
                kfree(holder);
        }
-       mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
+       mutex_unlock(&blk_holder_mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bd_unlink_disk_holder);