signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of assert_spin_locked
authorEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:16:10 +0000 (09:16 -0500)
committerEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Wed, 11 May 2022 19:34:14 +0000 (14:34 -0500)
commitcb3c19c93d656caa6fe63d6277aabd7e570f1d03
tree9417a39175b98f0fd014216ffe1139dc67a4d97d
parent16cc1bc67de88be19fa595f4645506ea2ac106d2
signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of assert_spin_locked

The distinction is that assert_spin_locked() checks if the lock is
held *by*anyone* whereas lockdep_assert_held() asserts the current
context holds the lock.  Also, the check goes away if you build
without lockdep.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Ympr/+PX4XgT/UKU@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220505182645.497868-6-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
kernel/signal.c