mm/memcg: Revert ("mm/memcg: optimize user context object stock access")

mm/memcg: Revert ("mm/memcg: optimize user context object stock access")

The optimisation is based on a micro benchmark where local_irq_save() is
more expensive than a preempt_disable(). There is no evidence that it is
visible in a real-world workload and there are CPUs where the opposite is
true (local_irq_save() is cheaper than preempt_disable()).

Based on micro benchmarks, the optimisation makes sense on PREEMPT_NONE
where preempt_disable() is optimized away. There is no improvement with
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC since the preemption counter is always available.

The optimization makes also the PREEMPT_RT integration more complicated
since most of the assumption are not true on PREEMPT_RT.

Revert the optimisation since it complicates the PREEMPT_RT integration
and the improvement is hardly visible.

[ bigeasy: Patch body around Michal's diff ]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YgOGkXXCrD%2F1k+p4@dhcp22.suse.cz
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YdX+INO9gQje6d0S@linutronix.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220226204144.1008339-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>