lsm: fix the logic in security_inode_getsecctx()
authorOndrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:44:03 +0000 (11:44 +0100)
committerPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Fri, 26 Jan 2024 22:19:00 +0000 (17:19 -0500)
commit99b817c173cd213671daecd25ca27f56b0c7c4ec
tree668ac8e97290fe7199e29786623e6dc076d5a19a
parent6613476e225e090cc9aad49be7fa504e290dd33d
lsm: fix the logic in security_inode_getsecctx()

The inode_getsecctx LSM hook has previously been corrected to have
-EOPNOTSUPP instead of 0 as the default return value to fix BPF LSM
behavior. However, the call_int_hook()-generated loop in
security_inode_getsecctx() was left treating 0 as the neutral value, so
after an LSM returns 0, the loop continues to try other LSMs, and if one
of them returns a non-zero value, the function immediately returns with
said value. So in a situation where SELinux and the BPF LSMs registered
this hook, -EOPNOTSUPP would be incorrectly returned whenever SELinux
returned 0.

Fix this by open-coding the call_int_hook() loop and making it use the
correct LSM_RET_DEFAULT() value as the neutral one, similar to what
other hooks do.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/CAEjxPJ4ev-pasUwGx48fDhnmjBnq_Wh90jYPwRQRAqXxmOKD4Q@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257983
Fixes: b36995b8609a ("lsm: fix default return value for inode_getsecctx")
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[PM: subject line tweak]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
security/security.c