mm/page_alloc: limit number of high-order pages on PCP during bulk free

mm/page_alloc: limit number of high-order pages on PCP during bulk free

When a PCP is mostly used for frees then high-order pages can exist on PCP
lists for some time.  This is problematic when the allocation pattern is
all allocations from one CPU and all frees from another resulting in
colder pages being used.  When bulk freeing pages, limit the number of
high-order pages that are stored on the PCP lists.

Netperf running on localhost exhibits this pattern and while it does not
matter for some machines, it does matter for others with smaller caches
where cache misses cause problems due to reduced page reuse.  Pages freed
directly to the buddy list may be reused quickly while still cache hot
where as storing on the PCP lists may be cold by the time
free_pcppages_bulk() is called.

Using perf kmem:mm_page_alloc, the 5 most used page frames were

5.17-rc3
  13041 pfn=0x111a30
  13081 pfn=0x5814d0
  13097 pfn=0x108258
  13121 pfn=0x689598
  13128 pfn=0x5814d8

5.17-revert-highpcp
 192009 pfn=0x54c140
 195426 pfn=0x1081d0
 200908 pfn=0x61c808
 243515 pfn=0xa9dc20
 402523 pfn=0x222bb8

5.17-full-series
 142693 pfn=0x346208
 162227 pfn=0x13bf08
 166413 pfn=0x2711e0
 166950 pfn=0x2702f8

The spread is wider as there is still time before pages freed to one PCP
get released with a tradeoff between fast reuse and reduced zone lock
acquisition.

On the machine used to gather the traces, the headline performance was
equivalent.

netperf-tcp
                            5.17.0-rc3             5.17.0-rc3             5.17.0-rc3
                               vanilla  mm-reverthighpcp-v1r1     mm-highpcplimit-v2
Hmean     64         839.93 (   0.00%)      840.77 (   0.10%)      841.02 (   0.13%)
Hmean     128       1614.22 (   0.00%)     1622.07 *   0.49%*     1636.41 *   1.37%*
Hmean     256       2952.00 (   0.00%)     2953.19 (   0.04%)     2977.76 *   0.87%*
Hmean     1024     10291.67 (   0.00%)    10239.17 (  -0.51%)    10434.41 *   1.39%*
Hmean     2048     17335.08 (   0.00%)    17399.97 (   0.37%)    17134.81 *  -1.16%*
Hmean     3312     22628.15 (   0.00%)    22471.97 (  -0.69%)    22422.78 (  -0.91%)
Hmean     4096     25009.50 (   0.00%)    24752.83 *  -1.03%*    24740.41 (  -1.08%)
Hmean     8192     32745.01 (   0.00%)    31682.63 *  -3.24%*    32153.50 *  -1.81%*
Hmean     16384    39759.59 (   0.00%)    36805.78 *  -7.43%*    38948.13 *  -2.04%*

On a 1-socket skylake machine with a small CPU cache that suffers more if
cache misses are too high

netperf-tcp
                            5.17.0-rc3             5.17.0-rc3             5.17.0-rc3
                               vanilla    mm-reverthighpcp-v1     mm-highpcplimit-v2
Hmean     64         938.95 (   0.00%)      941.50 *   0.27%*      943.61 *   0.50%*
Hmean     128       1843.10 (   0.00%)     1857.58 *   0.79%*     1861.09 *   0.98%*
Hmean     256       3573.07 (   0.00%)     3667.45 *   2.64%*     3674.91 *   2.85%*
Hmean     1024     13206.52 (   0.00%)    13487.80 *   2.13%*    13393.21 *   1.41%*
Hmean     2048     22870.23 (   0.00%)    23337.96 *   2.05%*    23188.41 *   1.39%*
Hmean     3312     31001.99 (   0.00%)    32206.50 *   3.89%*    31863.62 *   2.78%*
Hmean     4096     35364.59 (   0.00%)    36490.96 *   3.19%*    36112.54 *   2.11%*
Hmean     8192     48497.71 (   0.00%)    49954.05 *   3.00%*    49588.26 *   2.25%*
Hmean     16384    58410.86 (   0.00%)    60839.80 *   4.16%*    62282.96 *   6.63%*

Note that this was a machine that did not benefit from caching high-order
pages and performance is almost restored with the series applied.  It's
not fully restored as cache misses are still higher.  This is a trade-off
between optimising for a workload that does all allocs on one CPU and
frees on another or more general workloads that need high-order pages for
SLUB and benefit from avoiding zone->lock for every SLUB refill/drain.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220217002227.5739-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>