bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example
authorAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:02:13 +0000 (10:02 +1100)
committerStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 23:02:13 +0000 (10:02 +1100)
commit60843884c7d9daec2ae9109747498850eb74d159
treea69c70f44377aeaff04965314dbd6e5d3ea647c6
parente0c008179da22b84ee09648c8cd3798b6474a49a
bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example

It's not obvious that bitfield.h doesn't guarantee the bits.h inclusion
and the example in the former is confusing.  Some developers think that
it's okay to just include bitfield.h to get it working.  Change example to
explicitly include necessary headers in order to avoid confusion.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220207123341.47533-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Fixes: 3e9b3112ec74 ("add basic register-field manipulation macros")
Depends-on: 8bd9cb51daac ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Jan Dąbroś <jsd@semihalf.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
include/linux/bitfield.h